↩ Back

Privacy

One of the public’s top tech priorities is protecting online privacy. Policymakers should pass federal privacy legislation while making sure that the ad-supported Internet remains accessible to all.

Letter to VA Lawmakers: Oppose Governor’s Recommended Amendments to Social Media Bill (SB 854)

Utah Passes App Store Age Verification Bill Despite Constitutional Concerns

If signed, bill will trigger legal battle over speech & privacy

Letter to NH Lawmakers: Oppose Duplicative Changes to the New Hampshire Privacy Act (HB 195)

Letter to VA Governor: Veto Harmful Social Media Regulations (SB 854)

Letter to WV Lawmakers: Oppose Problematic Social Media Safety Regulations (HB 2609)

Letter to VT Lawmakers: Social Media Age Verification Requirement Undermines Speech and Privacy Rights (S. 69)

Coalition Letter to CA Privacy Regulators: Consider the Financial Burden of Proposed ADMT Rules

Letter to CA Privacy Regulators: Clarify Ill-Defined Elements of Proposed ADMT Rules

Testimony to WA Lawmakers: Social Media Legislation Poses Unintended Consequences (HB 1834)

Testimony to HI Lawmakers: Oppose Age Verification for App Developers and App Stores (SB 1542)

Letter to VA Lawmakers: Oppose Parental Consent Legislation (SB 854)

Letter to VA Lawmakers: Oppose Disruption to Balanced Privacy Law (SB 1023)

Letter to VA Lawmakers: Oppose Consumer Data Protection Act (SB 783)

PDF preview

Letter to VA Lawmakers: Oppose Changes to Privacy Protections for User-Generated Content (HB 2043)

Letter to European Data Protection Board: Comments on Personal Data Processing Guidelines

Letter to CA Governor: Veto Opt-Out Functionality Requirement (AB 3048)

Letter to NYC Councilmembers: Oppose Regressive Privacy Legislation (Int. 0539-2024)

Letter to Brazil’s Data Protection Authority: Comments on Social Media Age Verification and Parental Consent

Letter to CA Lawmakers: Oppose Age Verification Requirement for Online Platforms (AB 3172)

Letter to CPPA: Delay Rulemaking on Automated Decision-Making Technology

Tech, Civil Rights Coalition Rejects Law Enforcement Carveout for Data Brokers in Privacy Bill

On Thursday, a coalition including Chamber of Progress, Asian Americans Advancing Justice – AAJC, LGBT Tech, and UnidosUS called on...

TechCrunch Op-Ed: The government can’t seize your data — but it can buy it

EU-Facebook Fine Isn’t About Protecting Consumers

Facebook faces record fine as EU, US renegotiate data pact

Technology & Marketing Law Blog: Minnesota’s Attempt to Copy California’s Constitutionally Defective Age Appropriate Design Code is an Utter Fail

InsideSources Op-Ed: Banning Kids From Social Media Isn’t the Answer

Who Benefits from BIPA?

An Analysis of Cases Brought Under Illinois’ State Biometrics Law

Kaitlyn Harger

Privacy Comments to NTIA

Testimony to AZ Lawmakers: Oppose Biometric Data Restrictions (SB 1238)

Testimony to MD Lawmakers: Oppose Biometric Data Restrictions

As States Consider Biometric Bills, Illinois Supreme Court Urges Legislature to Revisit Its Law

Illinois biometric privacy rules may bankrupt small businesses

Testimony to AZ Lawmakers: Oppose Biometric Data Restrictions (SB 1238)

Testimony to HI Lawmakers: Oppose Restrictive Biometrics Legislation (SB 1085)

Letter to Washington Lawmakers: Changes Needed to Health Data Privacy Bill (HB 1155)

Smerconish Op-Ed: TikTok is a Runaway Success– but its Chinese Ownership is Problematic for the U.S.

House Marks Up Consumer Privacy Bill

Legislation provides significant new protections for consumers

Chamber of Progress Calls on DOJ to Update Data Privacy Stance Post-Dobbs Decision

DOJ stance sets dangerous precedent

What Voters Want: Consumer-Focused Tech Policy

Voters prioritize cybersecurity and data privacy when it comes to tech policy

Chamber of Progress Applauds FTC Privacy & Security Boost

Budget proposal would increase FTC budget by 30 percent

Sign Up To Keep Up